<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new Google UK Adwords Policy – My view on the pros and cons</title>
	<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/</link>
	<description>James Little writes about Affiliate Marketing, Search engine optimisation, Pay per click, Blogging, Wordpress, Internet Revenue, and other random thoughts</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32689</link>
		<author>James</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32689</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,
.
What I was saying is that before the change, merchants should not have allowed their affiliates to bid on their brand, as they could get it protected easily enough by google.
.
Now however some merchants may be forced to allow their affiliates (or some of them) to bid on their brand to stop their competition from appearing.  This will mean brand terms are more expensive for the merchants and commission will be paid out on sales via the easiest form of affiliate marketing, brand bidding.
.
A merchant can of course still stop affiliates bidding on their brand by stating this in their affiliate terms but they will now risk competition and competitive affiliates that they are unable to control coming up and sending the traffic elsewhere.
.
Hope that explains it - as I said, there are pros and cons and this is just one of them.
.
Cheers
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,<br />
.<br />
What I was saying is that before the change, merchants should not have allowed their affiliates to bid on their brand, as they could get it protected easily enough by google.<br />
.<br />
Now however some merchants may be forced to allow their affiliates (or some of them) to bid on their brand to stop their competition from appearing.  This will mean brand terms are more expensive for the merchants and commission will be paid out on sales via the easiest form of affiliate marketing, brand bidding.<br />
.<br />
A merchant can of course still stop affiliates bidding on their brand by stating this in their affiliate terms but they will now risk competition and competitive affiliates that they are unable to control coming up and sending the traffic elsewhere.<br />
.<br />
Hope that explains it - as I said, there are pros and cons and this is just one of them.<br />
.<br />
Cheers<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32684</link>
		<author>Neil</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32684</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, you didn't say you were annoyed, I said that, sorry.

So in your opinion, before this recent change in Google's policy merchants shouldn't have bothered bidding on their own brand name, but now they might/will find themselves in competition with their own affiliates?  This might force them to either a) bid on their own terms and/or b) explicitly state it is against their own terms and conditions when the affiliate signs up?

But then there will always be the problem of competing brands with similar products though as you mentioned (e.g. ipod vs Archos).

Anyways, interesting take on it, and again, I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, you didn&#8217;t say you were annoyed, I said that, sorry.</p>
<p>So in your opinion, before this recent change in Google&#8217;s policy merchants shouldn&#8217;t have bothered bidding on their own brand name, but now they might/will find themselves in competition with their own affiliates?  This might force them to either a) bid on their own terms and/or b) explicitly state it is against their own terms and conditions when the affiliate signs up?</p>
<p>But then there will always be the problem of competing brands with similar products though as you mentioned (e.g. ipod vs Archos).</p>
<p>Anyways, interesting take on it, and again, I wasn&#8217;t trying to put words in your mouth! <img src='http://www.3wdl.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32682</link>
		<author>James</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32682</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,
.
I'm not annoyed at all - the post was just providing some of the pros and cons of the changes to google's adwords policy from my POV as an affiliate manager.
.
I've mentioned a few times on my views of brand name bidding and that it adds no value whatsoever to a merchants campaign but this may very well change when the new regulations come into effect.
.
Thanks for your comments!
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,<br />
.<br />
I&#8217;m not annoyed at all - the post was just providing some of the pros and cons of the changes to google&#8217;s adwords policy from my POV as an affiliate manager.<br />
.<br />
I&#8217;ve mentioned a few times on my views of brand name bidding and that it adds no value whatsoever to a merchants campaign but this may very well change when the new regulations come into effect.<br />
.<br />
Thanks for your comments!<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32679</link>
		<author>Neil</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32679</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the response, I kind of figured that might be what you meant.  I guess I don't understand what the problem is really.  I suppose to me it sounds like you are annoyed by only providing info to the potential customer when they are in research mode but not getting the sale when they are in buy mode?  Perhaps you need to tailor your PPC/websites to buy mode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response, I kind of figured that might be what you meant.  I guess I don&#8217;t understand what the problem is really.  I suppose to me it sounds like you are annoyed by only providing info to the potential customer when they are in research mode but not getting the sale when they are in buy mode?  Perhaps you need to tailor your PPC/websites to buy mode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32603</link>
		<author>James</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32603</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil,
.
Essentially one of the problems that affiliate marketing has faced over the past year or two is the increase in programs allowing brand name bidding.
.
The problem with brand name bidding is that it is damaging to content affiliate sites.  Imagine that you are a camera review site and you have spend a lot of time on writing a review on the latest kodak camera.  You've then linked the article off to Jessops and a customer comes to your site (finding it via the natural listings) and goes though tot he jessops site,  a cookie is then dropped.
.
The customer doesn't buy straight away (perhaps he goes to look for some more reviews) but comes back to the Jessops site shortly after by searching on google for Jessops.  A brand PPC bidder has placed the ad and the cookie that you're site set is overriden.
.
Not a great scenario but it happens every minute - one of the problems is that we're likely to see this happen more and more with the changes in google's policy.
.
Thanks for your comment.
.
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil,<br />
.<br />
Essentially one of the problems that affiliate marketing has faced over the past year or two is the increase in programs allowing brand name bidding.<br />
.<br />
The problem with brand name bidding is that it is damaging to content affiliate sites.  Imagine that you are a camera review site and you have spend a lot of time on writing a review on the latest kodak camera.  You&#8217;ve then linked the article off to Jessops and a customer comes to your site (finding it via the natural listings) and goes though tot he jessops site,  a cookie is then dropped.<br />
.<br />
The customer doesn&#8217;t buy straight away (perhaps he goes to look for some more reviews) but comes back to the Jessops site shortly after by searching on google for Jessops.  A brand PPC bidder has placed the ad and the cookie that you&#8217;re site set is overriden.<br />
.<br />
Not a great scenario but it happens every minute - one of the problems is that we&#8217;re likely to see this happen more and more with the changes in google&#8217;s policy.<br />
.<br />
Thanks for your comment.<br />
.<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32574</link>
		<author>Neil</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32574</guid>
		<description>Sorry for being a numpty, but on your "More Brand bidding / Overridden cookies" section I don't really understand what you are implying might happen?  Could you explain in a little more detail please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for being a numpty, but on your &#8220;More Brand bidding / Overridden cookies&#8221; section I don&#8217;t really understand what you are implying might happen?  Could you explain in a little more detail please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Wrongs Don&#8217;t Make A Right - Or Are There Exceptions? &#187; Affiliate Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32385</link>
		<author>Two Wrongs Don&#8217;t Make A Right - Or Are There Exceptions? &#187; Affiliate Marketing Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/04/09/the-new-google-uk-adwords-policy-%e2%80%93-my-view-on-the-pros-and-cons/#comment-32385</guid>
		<description>[...] The new Google UK Adwords Policy – My view on the pros and cons [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The new Google UK Adwords Policy – My view on the pros and cons [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
