<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Community Choice A4UAwards Selection&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/</link>
	<description>James Little writes about Affiliate Marketing, Search engine optimisation, Pay per click, Blogging, Wordpress, Internet Revenue, and other random thoughts</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-40769</link>
		<author>Andrew</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-40769</guid>
		<description>TD not appearing is not a shock for me. I can't stand them, on payment terms, user interface, stats, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TD not appearing is not a shock for me. I can&#8217;t stand them, on payment terms, user interface, stats, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfft &#187; Content Heroes</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-38441</link>
		<author>pfft &#187; Content Heroes</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-38441</guid>
		<description>[...] appreciate that most of the &#8220;PPC Companies&#8221; who were nominated do also run content sites, however they probably wouldn&#8217;t get a mention if there was a pure content category? So where [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] appreciate that most of the &#8220;PPC Companies&#8221; who were nominated do also run content sites, however they probably wouldn&#8217;t get a mention if there was a pure content category? So where [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publishers Not Content With A4UAward Publisher Nominations? &#124; One Little Duck - Affiliate Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34551</link>
		<author>Publishers Not Content With A4UAward Publisher Nominations? &#124; One Little Duck - Affiliate Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34551</guid>
		<description>[...] One thing the A4UAwards throws up each year is a bit of discontent and discussion regarding the nominations (actually it&#8217;s throws up discontent and discussion about the type of awards, the voting process, the nominations, the winners etc etc so should it&#8217;s not really a surprise). There are one or two surprises in each category though but it&#8217;s the Publisher of the Year award that has sparked the most amount of debate on Affiliates4U and on various blogs including Moose on the Loose and 3WDL. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] One thing the A4UAwards throws up each year is a bit of discontent and discussion regarding the nominations (actually it&#8217;s throws up discontent and discussion about the type of awards, the voting process, the nominations, the winners etc etc so should it&#8217;s not really a surprise). There are one or two surprises in each category though but it&#8217;s the Publisher of the Year award that has sparked the most amount of debate on Affiliates4U and on various blogs including Moose on the Loose and 3WDL. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34548</link>
		<author>Chris Johnson</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34548</guid>
		<description>Hey James.

Just to let you know that affiliates4u members who's member type was set to affiliates were not able to vote for publisher of the year! You're right, I wouldn't know who to vote for either.

Here's hoping City get an away win at Palace on Saturday ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey James.</p>
<p>Just to let you know that affiliates4u members who&#8217;s member type was set to affiliates were not able to vote for publisher of the year! You&#8217;re right, I wouldn&#8217;t know who to vote for either.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping City get an away win at Palace on Saturday <img src='http://www.3wdl.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieron</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34497</link>
		<author>Kieron</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34497</guid>
		<description>Princess - You sound angry, and a little bit bitter. I'm sorry to hear that, I hope that your comments have helped to get it off your chest. To answer your question, out of the 5 nominees for "Affiliate Blog" of 2008, 1 went to Matt's stag do. Does that help you?

Princess and Rathergood - All members of A4U were invited to take part in the voting sessions for these awards so if somebody was or wasn't nominated then it was because A4U members either voted or didn't vote for them. It's that simple really. Not rocket science and not some conspiracy theory brought about by Matt and his team bent on world domination.

James - Unfortunately I wasn't shocked to see TD left out of the nominations. I think they're rather lost their way and most deifinitly their presence at grass roots level in the affiliate community over the last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Princess - You sound angry, and a little bit bitter. I&#8217;m sorry to hear that, I hope that your comments have helped to get it off your chest. To answer your question, out of the 5 nominees for &#8220;Affiliate Blog&#8221; of 2008, 1 went to Matt&#8217;s stag do. Does that help you?</p>
<p>Princess and Rathergood - All members of A4U were invited to take part in the voting sessions for these awards so if somebody was or wasn&#8217;t nominated then it was because A4U members either voted or didn&#8217;t vote for them. It&#8217;s that simple really. Not rocket science and not some conspiracy theory brought about by Matt and his team bent on world domination.</p>
<p>James - Unfortunately I wasn&#8217;t shocked to see TD left out of the nominations. I think they&#8217;re rather lost their way and most deifinitly their presence at grass roots level in the affiliate community over the last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34487</link>
		<author>James</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34487</guid>
		<description>Was in two minds about actually allowing two of the above comments, as I don't agree with them at all (especially the comment about Matt's stag do).. but we live in a democratic world and I only tend to apply moderation to spam!
.
Kieron - I guess it depends on what you classify as a content based affiliate! You are of course right and I was talking more about the main business model, which historically for most all but Quidco is paid search, but obviously to use Jamie/UKWB as an example they have a cashback site (giveortake) and a number of other properties.  Econversions have thisislocal and so on so forth.. 
.
Not really a criticism of them at all and I think that Jason summed it up quite well on the forum by saying that merchants are more likely to vote for paid search affiliates as they tend to drive more sales across a wider variety of programs.
.
Still think that TD not being included is the biggest shock for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was in two minds about actually allowing two of the above comments, as I don&#8217;t agree with them at all (especially the comment about Matt&#8217;s stag do).. but we live in a democratic world and I only tend to apply moderation to spam!<br />
.<br />
Kieron - I guess it depends on what you classify as a content based affiliate! You are of course right and I was talking more about the main business model, which historically for most all but Quidco is paid search, but obviously to use Jamie/UKWB as an example they have a cashback site (giveortake) and a number of other properties.  Econversions have thisislocal and so on so forth..<br />
.<br />
Not really a criticism of them at all and I think that Jason summed it up quite well on the forum by saying that merchants are more likely to vote for paid search affiliates as they tend to drive more sales across a wider variety of programs.<br />
.<br />
Still think that TD not being included is the biggest shock for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieron</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34483</link>
		<author>Kieron</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34483</guid>
		<description>Mate - are you sure that there are no content sites here? 100% sure? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mate - are you sure that there are no content sites here? 100% sure? <img src='http://www.3wdl.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rathergood</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34481</link>
		<author>rathergood</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34481</guid>
		<description>Matt Woods company nominated again for agency of the year... night as well skip the awards and just buy yourself some trinkets Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Woods company nominated again for agency of the year&#8230; night as well skip the awards and just buy yourself some trinkets Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princess</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34480</link>
		<author>princess</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/05/07/community-choice-a4uawards-selection/#comment-34480</guid>
		<description>Of course there wont be a content publisher. They are too busy building their sites and working on them to make a living. The others are all mates of Matts. Look at the nominations for blog of the year - its the fucking same every year. All Matts mates and a triumph of nepotism. For me as a newish affiliate Affi Liate has done more to help affiliates this year than anyone, but he wont get a vote cos he aint in the inner ring. How many of the nominees went on Matt stag do. It stinks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course there wont be a content publisher. They are too busy building their sites and working on them to make a living. The others are all mates of Matts. Look at the nominations for blog of the year - its the fucking same every year. All Matts mates and a triumph of nepotism. For me as a newish affiliate Affi Liate has done more to help affiliates this year than anyone, but he wont get a vote cos he aint in the inner ring. How many of the nominees went on Matt stag do. It stinks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
