<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Affiliate Marketing blog by James Little &#187; Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.3wdl.co.uk/category/advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk</link>
	<description>James Little writes about Affiliate Marketing, SEO, PPC, Blogging, Internet Revenue, and other random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:02:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Affiliate Summit &#8211; Are your affiliates adding value?</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2012/01/08/affiliate-summit-are-your-affiliates-adding-value/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2012/01/08/affiliate-summit-are-your-affiliates-adding-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2012/01/08/affiliate-summit-are-your-affiliates-adding-value/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the first session that I had listed as one to attend as it&#8217;s the most relevant topic for me today. Billed as looking at SEO, PPC, Coupon and other affiliates it will apparently look at what value each adds. Will be interesting to see if cashback/rebate is mentioned and after a number of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the first session that I had listed as one to attend as it&#8217;s the most relevant topic for me today.  Billed as looking at SEO, PPC, Coupon and other affiliates it will apparently look at what value each adds.</p>
<p>Will be interesting to see if cashback/rebate is mentioned and after a number of sessions at a4uexpo about incrementality it will be interesting to see if the US has similar views..</p>
<p>Apologies in advance for any spelling and formatting issues in the following post&#8230;</p>
<p>Traffic Patterns and Coupons sites</p>
<p>- Affiliates are supposed to have their own traffic<br />
- do your affiliate sales match your own sale.. Try launching the sale early with affiliates and see if they get an uplift<br />
- remove coupon code box, only show it when referred via a coupon site.<br />
- place own coupons on checkbox<br />
- use multiple cookies on each sale, shareasale support this.<br />
- his programs don&#8217;t work with coupon sites unless they agree to add an extra push once a month.. Used the word incremental!<br />
- coupon sites do add value.. </p>
<p>Trademark birders</p>
<p>Exactly the same points as what I&#8217;ve said on my blog time and time again.. Worthwhile if you have a generic brand (used wedding dresses.com as an example).  Also only other benefit around blocking your competitors.</p>
<p>Used the term modifiers, ie voucher code sites that big on brand +</p>
<p>Adware</p>
<p>Listed the good as large communities and showing ads in the SERPs.<br />
Helps show over a competitor site.  This may end up with a lawsuit&#8230;<br />
Using cashback sites such as ebates as an example. Less regulation in the US or rules like we have in the UK..<br />
Suggested the affiliate who loses a sale from adware could take you to court.. Crazy Americans..</p>
<p>Listed the bad as that it shows competitor ads over your own..<br />
Replacing other channels with affiliate cookies<br />
Lawsuits as mentioned above&#8230;</p>
<p>Cashback&#8230;</p>
<p>The bad&#8230; Adware<br />
Audit your sales.. Check return rate and cancel dates<br />
Low custom acquisition.. Customers go back and will margin cover this.<br />
Fraud orders</p>
<p>The good<br />
Move old inventory<br />
Great exposure for new or small brands<br />
New customer via media buys</p>
<p>I chipped in at this point to explain how big brands get just as much from cashback sites and how they should be used to support sales, etc.  Also mentioned that our stats show a high level of new customers, both on big and smaller brands.</p>
<p>Self Shoppers</p>
<p>Is the goal of your programme customer acquisition?  Only let them buy once..<br />
What are my margins<br />
Can be used to test the user experience and products for reviews<br />
May be used to test tracking<br />
How valuable is the customer</p>
<p>SEO</p>
<p>The bad..<br />
Are your affiliate links back links (answer, normally no..)<br />
Do affiliates take away from our internal efforts..<br />
SEO affiliates can be asked to help knock out bad reviews..<br />
Should we provide a keyword list? Ask affiliates to help knock out competitors here but if you close your program the traffic will go to the competitors.</p>
<p>Adam suggested that merchants should provide different alt tags and product descriptions for affiliates so that in it won&#8217;t affect your own seo, though this takes a lot of resource.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s it. Quite a lot covered off and the issues are very similar to the UK, minus the fact that there is a lot more adware in the USA.</p>
<p>In the questions all were around coupon codes &#8211; the usa has lots the issues that the UK has dealt with on the IAB guidelines.. User generated codes, code theft, etc. But there is no large body in the USA like the IAB to stop this.</p>
<p>Enjoyed the talk. Check out Adams blog at <a href="http://www.adamriemer.me">www.adamriemer.me</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2012/01/08/affiliate-summit-are-your-affiliates-adding-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merchant Advice: Checking your Affiliate stats to Identify abuse or fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2010/03/03/merchant-advice-checking-your-affiliate-stats-to-identify-abuse-or-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2010/03/03/merchant-advice-checking-your-affiliate-stats-to-identify-abuse-or-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3wdl.co.uk/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So let’s be honest here – whilst the perception of affiliate marketing continues to increase (and rightly so) this does also mean, even with a strong approval process on your affiliate programme, that the chances of abuse or fraud get bigger.  Detecting it is challenging but it’s one of the most important tasks to ensure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">So let’s be honest here – whilst the perception of affiliate marketing continues to increase (and rightly so) this does also mean, even with a strong approval process on your affiliate programme, that the chances of abuse or fraud get bigger.  Detecting it is challenging but it’s one of the most important tasks to ensure that you don’t pay out when you shouldn’t.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Lead programmes are often the most common problem but it really can affect everyone in the industry.  For example, a few months ago I was innocently browsing a bittorrent site and an advertising message came up saying “This site is brought to you by Sky Digital” – the whole page was taken over with the Sky site and further investigation showed it was an Affiliate on their buy.at programme opening the site in an iFrame (screenshot below).  I passed on the details to Helen and the affiliate was removed from the programme (and hopefully the network) the next day.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">From a merchant and agency perspective it’s actually quite difficult to stop this kind of abuse, after all, not many networks give you the referral URLs of where the sales or leads have been generated to protect the affiliate from having their ideas of information stolen, but there are tools that you can use to help you.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Tip 1 – Lag time analytics</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Most networks will let you pull of a report that shows the time between a click and a sale – this may be presented a number of ways, either with the actual time that the last click &amp; the sale were generated or actually be displaying the “lag” time in seconds.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">A suggestion of what you can do here is start to categorise your affiliates and look out for non-standard lag times.   For example the lag time coming from a voucher code will generally be very low (as it’s often the last place that a user comes before completing their transaction) whereas a non-brand paid search affiliate of a content affiliate will be longer.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">If you start to see very short lag times for affiliates that don’t fit into the brand/voucher/incentive types then it may be inductive of an affiliate using adware/spyware or at the very least someone to check with your network to find out more about how they are driving the traffic.   Very long lag times may be where affiliates have been cookie dropping (like the example above) and be especially important for some of the larger brands – again, categorise and check up on it, often it’s not that the affiliate is doing anything  wrong of course.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Top 2 – Checking Transaction Times</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Is going against your programme terms abuse?  We’d say that it is and you can use transaction times to check out where this may be happening.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">For example, if you see a high rate of out of office hours transactions coming from a particular affiliate then it’s likely that they are using a day-parted PPC campaign – not always abuse obviously but if you have tight PPC guidelines (that more and more merchants do have these days) and block brand then they may be doing this to make sure they are bidding on brand when you are less likely to be checking.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">You can also look out for temporary increases in traffic and sales too – this could just be where an offer has been featured on one of the deal sites but it could also be that an affiliate has sent out an unauthorised email campaign and if you’re very brand conscious then this may be against your terms and conditions.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Top 3 – Checking Conversion rates</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Again, just like with Lag times different types of affiliates and different promotional methods will give higher or lower conversion rates – someone that comes from an incentive site is likely, for example, to have a higher conversion rate and grouping / categorising your affiliates comes in handy again here.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">High conversion rates will often indicate brand bidding and very low conversion rates may indicate adware/spyware so its definitely another one to check.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Tip 4 – Using Analytics</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">You can use Google Analytics (or other analytics packages!) to get to grips with your inbound referrers – not everything will be picked up because the traffic comes from an affiliate network but as technology evolves more information is starting to be made available here.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Bits you can look out for include:</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Referrals from Webmail clients (yahoo, hotmail, etc) means that one or more of your affiliates has either featured you in their newsletter or send a solus email out.  Not indication of abuse but if it’s getting lots of clicks then you should check to see if it is something that you have provided them with or been authorised to send.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">When I worked client side for a gambling company we used a few incentive sites and the volume and quality was often low but manageable – one day an incentive site decided to feature us as their main offer without telling us and it cost us a lot of money.. It would have been nice for a warning so that we could have at least budgeted for it!</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Referrals from Search Engines may well show that you have affiliates using paid search and sending the traffic direct to site.  One of our clients at AffiliateFuture recently noticed this in their google logs and as the affiliate was going against the Paid search policy they were removed from the programme and their commission was revoked but they were a “house hold” name in the affiliate industry.  Perhaps an honest mistake, perhaps a deliberate one.. who knows?</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">If there is traffic coming through with no referrer then it may well be affiliates masking their links and removing the referrer from the users session.  Some affiliates just don’t trust networks or merchants to see where their traffic is coming from but personally I always suspect that affiliates masking their links on purpose may well be doing something against the terms.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Tip 5 – IP Addresses</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">This tip really speaks for itself.  Check the IP addresses for transactions, if you are seeing multiple transactions coming from IP then you may have problems.   This could be that your network is using some advance technology (so for example with Veracitag on AffiliateFuture all these transactions show on the same IP address)  but often it is more likely a someone doing something dodgy.  We kick affiliates off our network daily for filling out multiple lead forms time and time again.  It must take them ages and I can’t believe they are stupid enough to think that they won’t get caught out but there are ebooks being sold on ebay which tell people to do this to earn additional income – scary.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">Top 5 – Check the sales or leads even after you have paid out</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">I’ve left this tip till last as its one of the most important things that you can do and really does show where there could be fraud on your programme, not just abuse.  This may be from an affiliate or it may be from an incentive site user but the outcome is the same.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">As more and more networks and merchants look to improve the validation time and payout to affiliates this can lead to potential problems.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">For example, depending on your sector you should be looking for an abnormal amount of chargebacks (gaming) and returns (retail and telecoms).  Validating quickly can lead to a stronger affiliate programme but as mentioned, it’s always worth checking for abuse here.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">If you’ve got a lead based programme then you should really validate the email addresses and make sure you are not paying for bounce backs too – also check how long it is before a user unsubscribes, if it’s after the first email (or before) then they have probably signed up for an incentive and you should check if you are allowing this.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">I’m sure there is plenty more of this but the overall advise is there for all to see.  You will get abuse, you might even get fraud.  Plan for it, be wary of it and make sure that if you’ve got an affiliate programme you’ve also got the resource and the systems to manage it correctly and check things like this.This is mainly a post aimed towards merchants and agencies, but if you are an affiliate or network then hopefully you’ll find my first blog post in what seems like years an interesting read all the same.</div>
<p>This is mainly a post aimed towards merchants and agencies, but if you are an affiliate or network then hopefully you’ll find my first blog post in what seems like years an interesting read all the same.</p>
<p>So let’s get straight into it and be honest here – whilst the perception of affiliate marketing continues to increase (and rightly so) this does also mean, even with a strong approval process on your affiliate programme, that the chances of abuse or fraud get bigger.  Detecting it is challenging but it’s one of the most important tasks to ensure that you don’t pay out when you shouldn’t.</p>
<p>Lead programmes are often the most common problem but it really can affect everyone in the industry.  For example, a few months ago I was innocently browsing a bittorrent site and an advertising message came up saying “This site is brought to you by Sky Digital” – the whole page was taken over with the Sky site and further investigation showed it was an Affiliate on their buy.at programme opening the site in an iFrame (screenshot below).  I passed on the details to Helen and the affiliate was removed from the programme (and hopefully the network) the next day.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Sky Digital" src="http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash1/hs423.ash1/23462_10150105018710366_772705365_11318587_3839948_n.jpg" alt="" width="475" height="282" /></p>
<p>Imagine how negative this could have been for the Sky brand&#8230; You can almost see the headline &#8220;Sky Digital sponsoring illegal downloads&#8221;!</p>
<p>From a merchant and agency perspective it’s actually quite difficult to stop this kind of abuse, after all, not many networks give you the referral URLs of where the sales or leads have been generated to protect the affiliate from having their ideas of information stolen, but there are tools that you can use to help you.</p>
<p><strong>Tip 1 – Lag time analytics</strong></p>
<p>Most networks will let you pull of a report that shows the time between a click and a sale – this may be presented a number of ways, either with the actual time that the last click &amp; the sale were generated or actually be displaying the “lag” time in seconds.</p>
<p>A suggestion of what you can do here is start to categorise your affiliates and look out for non-standard lag times.   For example the lag time coming from a voucher code will generally be very low (as it’s often the last place that a user comes before completing their transaction) whereas a non-brand paid search affiliate of a content affiliate will be longer.</p>
<p>If you start to see very short lag times for affiliates that don’t fit into the brand/voucher/incentive types then it may be inductive of an affiliate using adware/spyware or at the very least someone to check with your network to find out more about how they are driving the traffic.   Very long lag times may be where affiliates have been cookie dropping (like the example above) and be especially important for some of the larger brands – again, categorise and check up on it, often it’s not that the affiliate is doing anything  wrong of course.</p>
<p><strong>Tip 2 – Checking Transaction Times</strong></p>
<p>Is going against your programme terms abuse?  We’d say that it is and you can use transaction times to check out where this may be happening.</p>
<p>For example, if you see a high rate of out of office hours transactions coming from a particular affiliate then it’s likely that they are using a day-parted PPC campaign – not always abuse obviously but if you have tight PPC guidelines (that more and more merchants do have these days) and block brand then they may be doing this to make sure they are bidding on brand when you are less likely to be checking.</p>
<p>You can also look out for temporary increases in traffic and sales too – this could just be where an offer has been featured on one of the deal sites but it could also be that an affiliate has sent out an unauthorised email campaign and if you’re very brand conscious then this may be against your terms and conditions.</p>
<p><strong>Tip 3 – Checking Conversion rates</strong></p>
<p>Again, just like with Lag times different types of affiliates and different promotional methods will give higher or lower conversion rates – someone that comes from an incentive site is likely, for example, to have a higher conversion rate and grouping / categorising your affiliates comes in handy again here.</p>
<p>High conversion rates will often indicate brand bidding and very low conversion rates may indicate adware/spyware so its definitely another one to check.</p>
<p><strong>Tip 4 – Using Analytics</strong></p>
<p>You can use Google Analytics (or other analytics packages!) to get to grips with your inbound referrers – not everything will be picked up because the traffic comes from an affiliate network but as technology evolves more information is starting to be made available here.</p>
<p>Bits you can look out for include:</p>
<p><strong>Referrals from Webmail clients </strong>(yahoo, hotmail, etc) means that one or more of your affiliates has either featured you in their newsletter or send a solus email out.  Not indication of abuse but if it’s getting lots of clicks then you should check to see if it is something that you have provided them with or been authorised to send.</p>
<p>When I worked client side for a gambling company we used a few incentive sites and the volume and quality was often low but manageable – one day an incentive site decided to feature us as their main offer without telling us and it cost us a lot of money.. It would have been nice for a warning so that we could have at least budgeted for it!</p>
<p><strong>Referrals from Search Engines</strong> may well show that you have affiliates using paid search and sending the traffic direct to site.  One of our clients at AffiliateFuture recently noticed this in their google logs and as the affiliate was going against the Paid search policy they were removed from the programme and their commission was revoked but they were a “house hold” name in the affiliate industry.  Perhaps an honest mistake, perhaps a deliberate one.. who knows?</p>
<p><strong>If there is traffic coming through with no referrer</strong> then it may well be affiliates masking their links and removing the referrer from the users session.  Some affiliates just don’t trust networks or merchants to see where their traffic is coming from but personally I always suspect that affiliates masking their links on purpose may well be doing something against the terms.</p>
<p><strong>Tip 5 – IP Addresses</strong></p>
<p>This tip really speaks for itself.  Check the IP addresses for transactions, if you are seeing multiple transactions coming from IP then you may have problems.   This could be that your network is using some advance technology (so for example with Veracitag on AffiliateFuture all these transactions show on the same IP address)  but often it is more likely a someone doing something dodgy.  We kick affiliates off our network daily for filling out multiple lead forms time and time again.  It must take them ages and I can’t believe they are stupid enough to think that they won’t get caught out but there are ebooks being sold on ebay which tell people to do this to earn additional income – scary.</p>
<p><strong>Tip 5 – Check the sales or leads even after you have paid out</strong></p>
<p>I’ve left this tip till last as its one of the most important things that you can do and really does show where there could be fraud on your programme, not just abuse.  This may be from an affiliate or it may be from an incentive site user but the outcome is the same.</p>
<p>As more and more networks and merchants look to improve the validation time and payout to affiliates this can lead to potential problems.</p>
<p>For example, depending on your sector you should be looking for an abnormal amount of chargebacks (gaming) and returns (retail and telecoms).  Validating quickly can lead to a stronger affiliate programme but as mentioned, it’s always worth checking for abuse here.</p>
<p>If you’ve got a lead based programme then you should really validate the email addresses and make sure you are not paying for bounce backs too – also check how long it is before a user unsubscribes, if it’s after the first email (or before) then they have probably signed up for an incentive and you should check if you are allowing this.</p>
<p>I’m sure there is plenty more of this but the overall advise is there for all to see.  You will get abuse, you might even get fraud.  Plan for it, be wary of it and make sure that if you’ve got an affiliate programme you’ve also got the resource and the systems to manage it correctly and check things like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2010/03/03/merchant-advice-checking-your-affiliate-stats-to-identify-abuse-or-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do merchants still insist on culling their affiliates?</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2009/10/21/why-do-merchants-still-insist-on-culling-their-affiliates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2009/10/21/why-do-merchants-still-insist-on-culling-their-affiliates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3wdl.co.uk/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve not blogged in a while, but after a few people moaned at me at the rather excellent Expo about it, I thought it was time to try and get a bit more going again. So I’ll start this with a rant.   As regular readers will know, as well as now working for a network [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve not blogged in a while, but after a few people moaned at me at the rather excellent Expo about it, I thought it was time to try and get a bit more going again.</p>
<p>So I’ll start this with a rant.   As regular readers will know, as well as now working for a network I still operate a couple of affiliate sites which pay for some beer tokens every now and again – not as much as I would like, but with a wife, three kids and a full time job it’s difficult to find the time!</p>
<p>Anyhow – when I apply to programmes it is generally with the explicit aim of doing some revenue with them, perhaps I’ve purchased a niche domain and want to use them on this site for example.  I don’t sign up to every programme under the sun as some affiliates will do.</p>
<p>Today I received notification that I had been suspended/removed from one of the programmes that I am signed up to due to lack of activity.  It’s not the first time that this has happened but does lead me once again to ask why there is such a lack of understanding from merchants that do this?  Do the networks advise their merchants that it’s a stupid idea? I believe they should…</p>
<p>The <strong>only </strong>good reason I’ve ever heard for this is that some networks charge merchants on a CPM for their banners being displayed, and the costs for this are sometimes more than the commission being paid – but this is more of an issue in the states from what I understand.</p>
<p>I challenge anyone to give me another decent reason for this, especially for a retailer.</p>
<p>I would suggest that any merchant who has thought about doing this thinks again for the following reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>Just because I’m not promoting you currently doesn’t mean I won’t in the future</li>
<li>If you reject me, I will just use your competitors in the future and you’ll be the ones losing out</li>
<li>If you communicate with your affiliates via newsletters then just by being signed up I’m likely to receive and read these looking for more opportunities – surely the more affiliates that read this the better</li>
</ul>
<p>I’m all for rejecting specific affiliates if their harming your brand / reputation but just culling all the non-active affiliates really is stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2009/10/21/why-do-merchants-still-insist-on-culling-their-affiliates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DGM &amp; Linkedin</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/09/02/dgm-linkedin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/09/02/dgm-linkedin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3wdl.co.uk/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m after some help. Can anyone explain to me the whole DGM and Linkedin thing?  It&#8217;s being advertised on the Affiliates4u site at the moment but I just don&#8217;t understand the benefits of it.  I get (and use) linkedin &#8211; it&#8217;s a great site for connecting with business contacts, getting some good introductions &#38; finding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m after some help.</p>
<p>Can anyone explain to me the whole <a href="http://www.dgm-uk.com/index.php/dgmaffiliates/get-linkedin-with-dgmpro">DGM and Linkedin thing</a>?  It&#8217;s being advertised on the <a href="http://www.affiliates4u.com">Affiliates4u</a> site at the moment but I just don&#8217;t understand the benefits of it.  I get (and use) <a href="http://www.linkedin.com">linkedin</a> &#8211; it&#8217;s a great site for connecting with business contacts, getting some good introductions &amp; finding who some of the key employees are at a company, great.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s the point of having a link to it in DGM?   I&#8217;ve not managed to spend the time digging out my login details (as I&#8217;ve not used DGM since the launch of DGMP..) but their website doesn&#8217;t really seem to explain what it does and the benefits of the mashup (if you can call it that).  Is it just for getting in contact with whoever manages the campaign at the merchant?  If so what&#8217;s the benefit of linkedin over an email address (or a comms centre)?</p>
<p>Answers on a the back of a postcard (or in the comments..).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/09/02/dgm-linkedin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free SEO Friendly Web Directories</title>
		<link>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/08/31/free-seo-friendly-web-directories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/08/31/free-seo-friendly-web-directories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3wdl.co.uk/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve not done much link building for a while now, but looked back and found the following sites that I used to use for directories &#8211; all of which at the time were free and didn&#8217;t require any reciprocal links but it&#8217;s been a while since I used them so some may have changed their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve not done much link building for a while now, but looked back and found the following sites that I used to use for directories &#8211; all of which at the time were free and didn&#8217;t require any reciprocal links but it&#8217;s been a while since I used them so some may have changed their policies.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the list &#8211; please leave a comment if I&#8217;m missing some out that the world should know about, especially UK specific ones.  I&#8217;ll have a look through them all when I have some spare time and find out if they are all still active (and free).</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.prolinkdirectory.com/">Prolink Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.acotm.com/">aCotm Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dirall.com/">DirAll Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.freewebsitedirectory.com/">Free Website Directory</a><br />
<a href="http://www.zoomdirectory.com/">Free Web Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.optimizedirectory.com/">Optimize Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.increasedirectory.com/">Increase Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.openlinkdirectory.com/">Open Link Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.cutedirectory.info/">Cute Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.the-free-directory.info/">The Free Directory</a><br />
<a href="http://www.addsitefree.com/">Add Site Free</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.best-net-sites.com/">Best Net Sites</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.freshtv.com/"> Fresh TV</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.infotiger.com/">Info Tiger</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.greatwebdirectory.com/">Great Web Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.klottra.com/">Klottra</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.18and65.com/">18 and 35</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.w3moz.com/">W3Moz</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.directory-free.com/">Directory Free</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ablazedirectory.com/">Ablaze Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.redlavadirectory.com/">Red Lava Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.klottra.com/">Klottra</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.doubledirectory.com/">Double Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.topdot.org/">Top Dot</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.webdirectory.netorado.com.com/">Webdirectory Netorado</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.add2us.com/">Add 2Us</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://zopso.com/">Zopso</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.beedirectory.com/">Bee Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.namedirectory.com.ar/">Name Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://webdir.addsite-submitfree.com.com/">WebDir Addsite SubmitFree</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.uc33.com/">UC33</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.newconceptdirectoy.com.ar.com/">New Concept Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.777media.com/">777 Media</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.directoryslick.com/">Directory Slick</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gainweb.org/">Gain Web</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.linksguru.net/">Links Guru</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.domain-link-exchange.com/">Domain Link Exchange</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.fat64.net/">Fat 64</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.the-web-directory.co.uk.com/">The Web Directory</a><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.creativeagency.eu/">Creative Agency</a></p>
<p>Now if I could only submit to them automatically!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.3wdl.co.uk/2008/08/31/free-seo-friendly-web-directories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

